🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an international accord created to safeguard females from abuse, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and heated discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final decision now lies with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in the Baltic state last year, mandating governments to establish legal frameworks and support services to end all forms of violence.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to initiate the process of exiting from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in two years ago, a decision that rights groups described as a major regression for gender equality.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The treaty was approved by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its focus on gender equality undermines family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to exit from the convention, a move proposed by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary political groups supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has called on the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the treaty not to be made political, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked broad outcry both inside the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a national petition calling for the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a protest for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Possible Next Steps

The head of the European organization's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a rash decision fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and human rights in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty four years ago, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority support, the head of state could possibly return the bill for additional review if he has objections.

President the national leader announced on social media that he would assess the decision according to legal principles, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," commented a rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in several EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could influence comparable discussions in additional EU countries